She Told Her Investors the Code Was Being Held Hostage. Then She Bought Back $2.5 Million of Equity for $225,000.
Erica Wassinger was across the table from a founder pitching a $75,000 investment. Everything was trending up and to the right. Then the founder said there was just one little problem. A dev consultant in Ukraine was holding her code base hostage.
Most founders save that kind of news for after the wire clears. This one led with it.
Erica's fund, Proven Ventures, sent the money anyway. Her investors had been surveyed on what industries they knew and what connections they had, and between all of them they worked the problem until it was solved. The founder, whom Erica calls Kelly, then bought every one of those shares back for $225,000, paid out of a slice of her monthly revenue. About a month after that, Proven led a multi-million dollar equity round. The shares Kelly had just bought back were worth $2.5 million.
Erica tells this story like a scientist who ran a good experiment and lost the bet. Either it shows the genius of the model, she says, or the joke's on her fund. It's designed to hand the upside back to the founder, and it did.
Kicking and Screaming Back to Nebraska
Erica grew up in Lincoln and spent summers in the Sandhills, where every neighbor doubled as an aunt or a grandma who bossed you around and watched out for you. She left. Dallas, then New York. Fifteen years ago she moved back to Nebraska kicking and screaming. She now says it's exactly where she's supposed to be.
Her route into venture capital wasn't the usual one. She studied journalism at Kansas State, "before influencer was a job title," which meant she graduated into a collapsing industry. What she loved about the work was the superlatives, the trending, the portfolios. She figured she wouldn't last long pitching mommy bloggers, so she found venture capital and stitched together an education. Wharton. Berkeley. A finance crash course that started with show me a spreadsheet and ended with how to structure a deal that works for everybody.
Stu did something similar with a Harvard Business School scaling ventures program, and the two of them compared notes. His point, which Erica backed: running a five-person team is a different job than running a fifty-person team, and the founders who don't grow with the company get outgrown by it.
I like that she has the credentials and still calls them stitched together. Founders who admit what they didn't know and go get it are the ones worth backing.
Why She Cuts Your Forecast in Half
Proven Ventures has a hard rule. Founders have to pay themselves a salary.
Erica says convincing them is a Herculean effort. Most founders list their own pay as zero when you first review the financials, let alone what it would cost to replace the roles they're quietly doing. She's got two reasons. The first is psychological. A founder who's backed into a corner at home can't think with abundance, and she wants them rested and performing. The second is the cost of the business. The founder is also the business development team, the bookkeeper, and the operations lead, and none of that is in the forecast.
Stu added the part that makes this hurt. A buyer calculates what it would cost to replace you. If you've been paying yourself $100,000 and a buyer thinks it takes $300,000 to hire someone as good, they subtract the $200,000 from the price. Underpaying yourself isn't frugality. It's a hidden debt you hand to whoever buys you.
The forecasting rule is just as blunt. Every founder has three forecasts: the one in the investor deck, the real one, and the one they privately need to hit so their mental health stays intact. Proven cuts every forecast by 50 to 60 percent and commits to that number. In Kelly's case, that meant buying the shares back at 5 percent of gross revenue every month.
She Hates Pitch Decks. Her Love Language Is a CRM.
Stu asked the question every founder wants answered: how do you get Erica's attention?
Her answer is the best fundraising advice in the episode. She says she kind of hates pitch decks, because they signal that a founder spent more time preparing to talk to an investor than to a customer. If you're going to send her something, send the demo you give your customers. One of her portfolio companies sells to cardiothoracic surgeons. She doesn't understand what's in that sales demo, because she isn't a cardiothoracic surgeon. She loves seeing it anyway, because it shows the founder's commitment to the customer and the sales motion.
She won't even let you use a deck on a call. She wants you to tell her about your customer, the problem you're solving, how the product creates value in their world, and how a dollar of capital turns into $3 of revenue. She put it into a Founders Field Guide to being capital ready. Financials can be messy, but she wants you to know your cost of goods sold and err on the expensive side. She wants to see the KPIs a CEO sets each month or week, tied back to the forecast. That's where she sees repeatability.
Then she says it: her love language is a CRM.
To get her attention, skip the cold intro. Fill out the contact form on her site, which feeds her CRM, and she checks it constantly. Or listen to an episode like this one and send a personalized LinkedIn invite that says what you liked. Stu said the same about his own site. A friend wanted an introduction for a professor who needed help with his ed tech tools, and Stu told him to use the website, because a text or email has a very high chance of getting lost.
I'll say it plainly. A founder who can't show an investor the sales motion isn't ready for money, no matter how good the deck looks.
Capped at 3x, and Beating the Top Quartile
Proven Ventures runs a $10 million fund, invests only in Nebraska founders, and is putting its last $1 million of Fund One to work in its fifth year. Fund Two, likely in the next year to year and a half, will probably reach beyond the state.
The mechanism is what Erica calls debt equity. Proven invests, the buyout is structured on day one, and the founder buys shares back as a percentage of gross revenue each month until the fund has reached 3x. If the founder exits at any size, they hold preferred equity that earns a return. Compare that to a traditional equity round, which takes 20 percent of your company and sets a clock on your exit.
The gap she's filling is the one in the middle. A founder is bankable but not venture. The bank won't underwrite without four or five years of financials or a house as collateral. Equity feels too expensive, and a venture fund's timeline might not match the founder's market.
Erica then explained why she's happy to cap herself. Funds are measured by a few metrics, most of them fake, because investors can write up a company's value however they like. One metric requires cash going back to the investors. Carta's Q2 fund analysis, she says, shows Proven outperforming the top-quartile fund by three times on that one. She'd much rather clip the coupon and cap the fund at 3x, she said, and know she's actually sending cash back to her investors. She also said she's menopausal and doesn't have room for more volatility.
Her goal is the oddest one in venture capital. She wants to be obsolete on your cap table. She wants Fund One to stay inside its ten-year window with no extensions.
There's an honest cost, and she names it. Proven gave up real upside on Kelly's company. She also says the profitability and EBITDA that Silicon Valley treated as dirty words in 2021 are now what brokers and acquirers use to set a price. She felt crotchety and old saying so as a VC, and it has ended up saving her companies.
Stu brought the other side of the table. His friends-and-family seed round in 2013 included a $25,000 investment. In 2021, that investor received a check for $967,000. Different structure, same lesson. Investors don't need a billion-dollar outcome to get paid, and neither do founders. Erica thinks Silicon Valley glamorized growth at all costs, and that most businesses don't hit milestones that way.
The Founders She Never Worries About
Ask a venture fund what value it adds and you'll hear connections and introductions. Erica thinks that's table stakes. When she looks at the texts from her portfolio founders and the agenda for their meetings, the value is solving problems. The 3 a.m. panic. A portfolio full of mistakes gives you pattern recognition, and that's what she can hand a founder.
Her best founders, though, are the ones who could care less about her value-add. They don't count on it for their success. They call when things are really bad, and they tell her the truth. In one portfolio company, an executive hire went wrong and burned through cash. Their reaction, she says: get rid of the person, move on, no big deal. She doesn't worry about follow-on checks for founders like that, because they'll figure it out.
Proven does allocate follow-on capital for every company. But writing a check to a struggling company is white-knuckle work. Writing one to a founder who tells the truth is easy sleep. Stu closed the loop: capital doesn't mask bad problems, it accelerates great growth.
What Stuck With Me
Most VCs talk about how big the outcome could be. Erica talks about what you'll pay back, how fast, and when she gets to leave. She wants to be a Nebraska investor in Nebraska fashion: no theatrics, results only, in the land of Warren Buffett.
I also appreciated the way she handled the pretend-cowgirl joke. She's a huge fan of Dax and Bodie, the founders of Silver Spur Ranch in Idaho, and Stu said a great entrepreneur isn't so different from a cowgirl. You figure it out with limited resources. You keep the herd alive. You can't bet the farm every time.
She runs a fund built on that idea. Most investors want to stay on your cap table forever. She wants to be paid back, shake your hand, and get out of your way.
Recorded for the Startups with Stu podcast. More at startupswithstu.com.
Subscribe for Updates
Subscribe to the Startups With Stu newsletter and get advice and stories sent straight to your inbox to help launch your business to the moon!




Comments